Review sources
How to show eBay feedback on your website
To show eBay feedback on your website you connect your seller profile to a review widget and paste a short snippet where the proof belongs, usually near the price or the checkout button. There is no file to download and no plugin marketplace step, because your feedback profile is public and the widget reads it from there. The part that catches people out is not the connection, it is that eBay feedback is a different animal from a Google review: it has three possible ratings rather than five, and a meaningful slice of it was written by eBay rather than by your customer.
We have been importing eBay seller feedback since January 2020. This post is built on what that data actually looks like, measured on 28 August 2026: 202,282 entries across 90 accounts, held through 106 live connections. That makes eBay the third largest source in our database after Google and Allegro, which is why the quirks below are worth knowing before you put any of it on a page.
eBay feedback is not a five-star rating
Every widget in this category, ours included, renders eBay feedback as stars, because that is what visitors understand. But eBay does not collect stars for seller feedback. It collects three states: Positive, Neutral, Negative. Those map onto 5, 3 and 1, and nothing else exists. Here is the entire distribution of our eBay data on 28 August 2026.
| Rating shown | eBay’s actual label | Entries | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 stars | Positive | 199,461 | 98.60% |
| 4 stars | does not exist | 0 | 0.00% |
| 3 stars | Neutral | 1,406 | 0.70% |
| 2 stars | does not exist | 0 | 0.00% |
| 1 star | Negative | 1,415 | 0.70% |
Two things follow from that table. First, if a widget ever shows you a four-star eBay review, it did not come from eBay. Second, an eBay average will always look extreme next to a Google average, because there is no middle of the scale to sit in. Our eBay set averages 4.958. That is not a sign of a suspiciously perfect seller, it is arithmetic on a three-point scale where the middle is used 0.70% of the time.
The practical consequence is a layout one. If you blend eBay feedback into a single site-wide average alongside Google, you produce a number your visitor cannot verify and that quietly flatters you. Keep the source logo on every card and let the two read separately. We make the same argument in more detail about marketplace reviews in general, and it applies to eBay more sharply than to any other source we handle.
eBay writes some of your feedback for you
This is the finding that surprises sellers most. When a buyer leaves a rating without typing a comment, eBay does not leave the comment empty. It fills the text in from a template. There are at least four templates in circulation, in English, Spanish and Portuguese, and the list has grown over time rather than staying fixed.
On 28 August 2026 we counted 13,919 such entries across 24 accounts, which is 6.88% of everything we hold from eBay. Every single one is five stars. On one seller’s profile they made up roughly a third of the visible feed, which is exactly how the problem gets reported to us: not as “these reviews are fake” but as “my widget keeps repeating itself”.
They are not fake in the sense that matters legally. Each one sits behind a real transaction and a real buyer’s rating. But they are not testimony either, and a visitor scrolling a widget that says “Order delivered on time with no issues” eight times in a row reads it as filler, which is the opposite of what a review widget is for. The related trap, buying the appearance of proof outright, is covered in why buying reviews is a trap; this one is more innocent and more common.
We stopped importing template entries in July 2026, so new connections never see them. Entries already stored stay where they are unless the account owner decides otherwise, because hiding a review is the account owner’s call and not ours. Where owners have chosen to hide them, the effect on the headline number is negligible: removing all 13,919 moves our eBay average from 4.958 to 4.955. The feed reads completely differently, and the rating barely moves. That is usually the right trade.
What our own import numbers look like, including the bad part
A source page that only shows you good numbers is not evidence, it is marketing. Here is our monthly eBay import volume, which contains a seven-month hole we caused ourselves.
| Month | Entries imported | Accounts receiving |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 1,404 | 18 |
| Oct 2025 | 1,502 | 19 |
| Nov 2025 | 2,014 | 19 |
| Dec 2025 | 30 | 14 |
| Jan 2026 | 8 | 7 |
| Feb 2026 | 3 | 2 |
| Mar 2026 | 10 | 8 |
| Apr 2026 | 23 | 8 |
| May 2026 | 211 | 7 |
| Jun 2026 | 9 | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | 24,824 | 28 |
| Aug 2026 | 1,774 | 27 |
From December 2025 to June 2026 we imported 294 eBay entries in total, against roughly two thousand a month before that. eBay had not blocked anything and no credentials had expired. Our importer stopped scanning a profile after it saw forty consecutive entries it already knew, on the assumption that a feedback page is ordered newest first. It is not. When we measured a live profile page, we found entries we had never seen sitting at positions 71, 102, 128, 167 and 186, behind a run of 70 already-known ones at the top. The scan gave up before reaching them, every single night, without ever reporting an error. It looked healthy and it was starving.
We fixed the scan in late July 2026 and ran a catch-up across every active eBay connection. The three spikes inside that July figure are visible day by day: 7,999 entries on 24 July, 7,498 on 27 July and 8,903 on 28 July. August’s 1,774 across 27 accounts is the honest steady-state number, and that is roughly what a working eBay connection looks like at our current scale.
We are publishing the hole rather than the recovery because a silent failure is the specific risk of every marketplace connector, ours and everyone else’s. A source that has quietly stopped delivering looks identical to a source where nothing new has happened. The only defence is to check the date of the newest entry, not whether the connection says “connected”. We keep a running audit of exactly that across every source we support in which review sources still work in 2026.
Putting it on the page
The mechanics are short. Connect your seller profile, wait for the first import to finish, choose a layout, and paste the snippet into your template. Everything after that is judgement.
Three decisions actually matter. Where the widget goes: eBay feedback is delivery and packaging testimony, so it earns its place next to shipping information and the buy button, not on an About page. How many cards you show: with a three-point rating scale, a long scroll of identical five star cards persuades less than four well-chosen ones, and the templated entries make that worse. Whether you show the source logo: you should. Feedback from a marketplace is credible precisely because the visitor knows you did not control it, and stripping the logo throws that away.
One decision that is not yours to make: do not edit the text. Marketplace feedback is a public record, your visitor can go and check it, and a widget whose job is trust cannot be caught paraphrasing. The same reasoning applies to Amazon reviews on your own site, where the rules around what may be displayed are tighter still.
Should eBay be your only source?
It can be, and for 25 of our 90 eBay accounts it is. The other 65 pair it with something else, most often Google on 39 accounts, Facebook on 26 and an Amazon marketplace on 19. That split is worth reading as advice rather than trivia. Marketplace feedback is unusually strong evidence for a narrow claim, that you ship what you promised, on time, repeatedly, at volume. It is weak evidence for everything a visitor wonders about on your own domain: whether you answer emails, whether the product suits their case, whether you existed last year.
If eBay is your only trading channel, start there and add a second source when you have one. If you already sell direct, eBay feedback works best as the volume layer underneath a smaller number of richer reviews.
Doing this with JustReview
We built the connector that produced every number above, so the awkward parts are handled rather than discovered by you later. Template entries written by eBay are filtered at import. The three-state rating scale is mapped honestly, so you will never see a fabricated four-star card. The scan reads whole pages rather than trusting the order eBay serves them in, which is the specific bug that cost us seven months and that we do not intend to repeat. Feedback stays synced, so a page you paste once keeps updating. If you want to see it working on real data before deciding anything, the eBay reviews widget page has a live demo, and you can create an account and connect a profile without a card.
Two honest limits. A full history of a very large profile takes several import passes rather than arriving in one go, because feedback pages are walked rather than downloaded. And entries already stored before July 2026 keep their templated text until you choose to hide them, since changing what is visible on your widget is your decision and we do not make it for you.
Plans and the review limits attached to them are on the pricing page. If eBay is where your proof lives, this is how you move it to the page where you actually get paid.
FAQ
Can I export my eBay feedback?
There is no export button that gives you a usable file, and you do not need one. Your seller feedback profile is public, and a widget reads it on your behalf and keeps a synced copy. What you paste into your site is a short snippet, so new feedback keeps appearing without you editing the page again. The practical limit is not access, it is that a profile is paginated and a full history takes several passes to walk.
Why does all my eBay feedback show as five stars?
Because eBay feedback is not a five-star scale. It is Positive, Neutral or Negative, and a widget maps those three onto 5, 3 and 1. Across the 202,282 eBay entries we held on 28 August 2026, 98.60% sit at five stars, 0.70% at three and 0.70% at one, and there is not a single four or two in the entire set. Any widget showing you a four-star eBay review invented it.
Are the repeated 'delivered on time' entries real reviews?
They are real transactions, but nobody typed them. When a buyer leaves a rating without a comment, eBay fills in the text from a template. On 28 August 2026 we counted 13,919 such entries across 24 accounts, 6.88% of everything we hold from eBay, and every one of them is five stars. We stopped importing them in July 2026, and the ones already stored can be hidden per account.
Should eBay feedback be the only source on my site?
It works, but it is the narrower choice. Of the 90 accounts with eBay feedback in our database on 28 August 2026, 25 use eBay alone and 65 pair it with something else, most often Google on 39 accounts and Facebook on 26. Marketplace feedback proves you ship well. It does not prove much about a business a visitor is meeting for the first time on your own domain.